The Hechinger Study is a national nonprofit newsroom that reports on one topic: education. Sign upward for our weekly newsletters to go stories like this delivered directly to your inbox.

The pursuit of prestige has clouded the thinking of many leaders at four-year postsecondary institutions.

When faced with tightening land budgets, far besides many wait to climb up the ratings ladder and shore up funding, by increasing tuition and fees, cutting vital support services that serve underprepared students, and chasing after the "best and the brightest" and those who are able to pay "full freight."

Equally a result, many students ending up on campuses that don't have supports in place to go them through to graduation. Even worse, some students don't apply at all, scared off by high price tags. These practices are reshaping where poor kids attend college and widening inequities in college access and success that have existed for far too long.

Related: While Washington wavers, states provide detailed college ratings

The regime tries to convalesce some of the sticker shock through Pell Grants, demand-based aid provided to students from depression-income families in hopes of bridging the financial gap to college. Most nine million students receive Pell Grants and use them to enroll in institutions all over the country.

The problem, though, is institutions never have to demonstrate their ability to educate and support these students through to graduation. Leaders pocket this taxpayer money on behalf of their institutions and carry on in their efforts to maximize prestige with no follow-up that they've done their job.

Fortunately, the Obama administration is get-go to prod. This calendar month, it released its College Scorecard, which includes a host of information virtually individual colleges in hopes of making the decision-making process easier for students and families. And with it, they released long-sought after information, including the graduation rates of Pell Grant recipients. Already, media outlets have used the data to create lists and other interactives that allow readers to sort through colleges with the best outcomes for low-income students.

Related: Obama administration takes big step in simplifying fiscal-aid application procedure

This transparency is long overdue, merely information technology's non sufficient. Publicly posting graduation rates for Pell recipients won't pb to colleges and universities doing more to enroll more low-income students, a change President Obama called for 2 years ago.

This transparency must exist coupled with accountability to create the equitable higher pedagogy organisation that our nation's youth deserve.

In that location are more than 100 colleges that enroll a freshman class where less than 1 in seven students are Pell-eligible students. This is unreasonable, given that virtually four in 10 total-time undergraduates in this country are Pell recipients.

These institutions — mostly highly selective and wealthy — are what we call "engines of inequality" for exacerbating inequalities for our nation's youth.

Nosotros need to do more!

Related: Liberal arts colleges must jettison antiquated lectures to stay relevant

If institutions can't enroll a blank minimum percentage of depression-income students — and get them through to graduation — they shouldn't have access to establishment-based federal financial aid or to the enormous tax benefits that many of our richest institutions receive.

Information technology'due south the premise of our Tough Love report, which outlines ways the federal authorities can leverage its investments in higher pedagogy for amend outcomes for students. And information technology's a call we reaffirm in our newest analysis, The Pell Partnership , which finds a deep and rooted gap in the graduation rates between Pell students and their non-Pell peers, despite a pocket-sized average gap of 5.seven percentage points at the average institution.

Nationally, about half of Pell students graduate in vi years; for not-Pell students, that rate is 65 percent. And alarmingly, information technology's a gap that would persist even if every institution that enrolled Pell students closed their own gaps in graduation rates. Why? Considering, the national gap isn't just about gaps in institutional performance. Information technology is but equally much a office of where students enroll. Compared to non-Pell recipients, Pell students are predominantly clustered at poor-performing colleges and universities where as well few complete. And too few Pell students have the opportunity to nourish selective institutions that graduate nigh of their kids.

Related: An unprecedented look at Pell Grant graduation rates from ane,149 schools

Federal action should showtime with the near egregious offenders: rich institutions that don't serve their fair share of low-income students and institutions that produce far more debt than degrees.

Merely federal action alone won't be enough. To plow this effectually nosotros need the cooperation of the vast majority of institutions — the ones that could do a lot better if they really focused. Showtime, institutions must make equity a higher priority. Gaps in completion for students from different backgrounds shouldn't exist acceptable.

Second, low completion rates shouldn't be explained away no affair where students enroll. Our experience and the use of our College Results Online Spider web tool tells united states of america that similar colleges that serve the same types of students tin accept very dissimilar outcomes for students.

Finally, leaders at selective schools should stop elevating the narrow self-interest of their institutions above the interests of the most vulnerable students and the public good — these are non mutually sectional priorities. These leaders should "lead," reaffirming their institutions' delivery to enroll their fair share of students from low-income backgrounds.

Together these efforts may non accost all of our challenges, but they volition certainly put united states on the path to greater equity in access and success.

Andrew Nichols is director of higher pedagogy research and data analytics at The Teaching Trust and the writer of The Pell Partnership: Ensuring a Shared Responsibility for Depression-Income Student Success.

José Luis Santos is the vice president of higher educational activity policy and practice at The Education Trust.

The Hechinger Report provides in-depth, fact-based, unbiased reporting on instruction that is free to all readers. Merely that doesn't mean it'south complimentary to produce. Our piece of work keeps educators and the public informed about pressing issues at schools and on campuses throughout the land. We tell the whole story, fifty-fifty when the details are inconvenient. Help us keep doing that.

Join us today.

Andrew Nichols is director of higher teaching research and data analytics at The Education Trust and the author of The Pell Partnership: Ensuring a Shared Responsibility for Low-Income Educatee Success.

José Luis Santos is the vice president of higher education policy and practice at The Education Trust. More past José Luis Santos